🔗 Share this article Russia Seeks Substantial Amount in Compensation against Euroclear over Seized Assets Russia's monetary authority has stated it is claiming compensation amounting to $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This move constitutes a clear warning by the Kremlin against proposals to utilize frozen Russian sovereign funds to aid Ukraine. The Legal Claim Based on accounts in Russian news outlets, the monetary authority filed a lawsuit last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion claim. European Union officials are set to decide in the coming days on a proposal to use around €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. The proposal involves granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its military and financial needs. The vast majority of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution acts as the primary keeper for the Russian immobilised sovereign wealth. Dispute on Ownership EU authorities have argued that their proposal is legally sound. Their position is based on the fact that ownership of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, even though it was immobilized in European jurisdictions following the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine. The Russian government, however, has called any utilization of the funds as theft. Authorities have warned of reciprocal measures, such as seizing EU private investors' holdings within Russia. Kirill Dmitriev, who has assumed a key position in peace negotiations, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He added that the EU, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal. Strategic Positioning In comments interpreted as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the assets plan as "a vicious attack on the right to ownership and the international reserves system established by the United States." The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the latest lawsuit. The institution has previously noted it is facing over 100 legal cases in Russian courts. Legal Hurdles Ahead Although judges in EU countries are not expected to recognize judgments from Russian courts, analysts anticipate Moscow to pursue implementation in nations with closer relations to the Kremlin. "Russian monetary authorities could try to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, provided that such assets can be located," commented a legal expert from an international firm. EU Countermeasures EU officials said they are working on steps to deter other countries from assisting any Russian lawsuits against European companies. They are also designing safeguards to shield EU member states with assets in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation." The Proposed Loan Mechanism According to the detailed scheme, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the cash earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would stay untouched. Ukraine would solely be obligated to repay the loan if and when Russia consented to pay reparations for the immense destruction inflicted during the ongoing conflict. Other Funding Ideas The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an different approach for financing Ukraine. This entails common EU borrowing to fund a loan, using unused funds within the European budget. This alternative move, however, requires unanimity among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has already signaled its opposition. Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, said the reparations loan as "the most credible solution" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian frozen assets, meaning it is not drawn from our public funds, which is also important," she stated. "Furthermore, it sends a powerful signal that when you cause all this destruction to another country, you have to pay for the reparations."